CHUMASH CANDESCENCE
 PARASHA TZAV
LEVITICUS  6:01-8:36
RABBI ARTHUR  SEGAL
Via Shamash Org on-line class service
Jewish Renewal www.jewishrenewal.info
Jewish Spiritual Renewal
Jewish Spirituality
Eco Judaism
Hilton Head Island, SC, Bluffton, SC, Savannah, GA
"Mare's  Sweat"
Did all y'all love watching Zero Mostel, of  blessed memory, perform as  much as I did? He was such a wonderful presence  on the stage and screen. I  remember him well as Pseudolus in A Funny Thing  Happened on the Way to the Forum. He and another character aptly named Hero,  were chasing after
horses trying to extract mare's sweat to be used in a  potion. How silly and so pagan, the audience thought, to use a large mammal's  glandular secretions for an elixir.
I wonder if Cecil B. DeMille were to  make a sequel to the Ten
Commandments would he have Zero play Aaron chasing  after red heifers when he came to this part of the Bible? Let me explain.  
While this week's Torah portion is Tzav from the book of  Leviticus, next Shabbat is one of the special Sabbaths that come before  Passover (as well as Purim), and it is called Parah. We
read a special  portion from the Torah (a maftir) from Numbers 19:01 to 22. It is about our  priests finding a perfect unblemished red cow, burning the whole animal  including its dung, and adding in a bit of red thread and some spices.  
Then a "pure" man gathered the ash and mixed it with water. He then  became "unclean." But, anyone else who became unclean by touching a corpse,  could become clean by sprinkling the dead cow's ashes on themselves. This type  of law is called a "chuk," a decree. There was no rational rhyme or reason for  it.
Regarding this law, King  Solomon said, "I said I would be wise, but it [the explanation] is far from me"  (Proverbs 7:23). Modern Israelis when asked about a nonsensical governmental  law, will say "Parah Adamah" (it's a red cow). In Job (14:04), it is asked :"Who  can draw a pure thing out of an impure one? Is it not the One God?" Perhaps Zero  Mostel could.
This week's Torah parasha derives it name from the word  "command," as God is giving us more sacrificial ritual laws. For those of us who  have ever dissected a frog in high school or have gone on to study larger  animals, a quick read of this section will bring back some memories of your  favorite (or not so  favorite) organs.
 The rabbis long after the  Temple was destroyed and the
sacrifices were stopped have tried to parse some  mussar (ethical
teachings) from this portion.
I invite you to look at  Leviticus 6:18. "This is the law of the sin
offering. At the PLACE [capitals  are mine] where you slaughter the elevation offering, you shall slaughter the  sin offering." Talmud Tractate Yevamot (8:3) explains that this was enacted to  save those who sinned from embarrassment. 
Folks who sinned and those  who were bringing offerings to raise their spiritual level were all in the same  area. No one could be pointed out as a sinner.
We learn from this that if God could make certain that sinners were not publicly shamed, surely it is important for each of us not to humiliate or cause public discomfort to another.
 Rabbi Elazar taught "that  one who humiliates his  fellow in public, though he may know Torah and do  good deeds, has no
share in the world to come" (Pirkei  Avot 3:15).  Talmud Bava Metziah (58b) says shaming someone publicly drains the blood from  his face and is tantamount to murder.
The Torah also shows sensitivity to  the feelings of the poor. It permits each person to bring what he could afford.  A closer read will see that the Torah refers to one bringing an expensive bull  as a "person." But the Torah's author calls one bringing a bread offering a  "soul." It is not the value of our gifts that is important, but rather our  intention that is crucial.
A poor man may not know from  when or where his next 'bread' is coming. And so it is with our prayer (see last  week's d'var). What is important about our prayers is not the showy length of  the service, or if we can rock and chant faster than our pew's neighbor, or if  we can  speed- read in Hebrew. Rather it is our intention, our kavenah,  that must be  pure and from our soul.
Another section of the parasha  deals with thanksgiving offerings (Lev 7:1-15). This ritual is still done today  in an abbreviated fashion on some bimahs at the time of the Torah reading. It is  now called "Birkat ha Gomel." 
Traditionally one makes this  beracha   if one has survived childbirth,  recovered from  illness, arrived safely from a journey, or escaped unharmed  from an   accident. Actually, there is one more. If you escaped from prison where you were  to be executed, this prayer was said as well. (Obviously, this
prayer for  THIS reason is rarely heard in Texas.) 
When we read this portion and  think of the body parts and organs of the  animals on the altar and  elsewhere, perhaps for a moment instead of reeling in disgust, let us think for  a second of all the body parts that we have that are working well that we take  for granted.
 In our morning prayers,  we  traditionally thank God for our consciousness,  our mobility, and  our eyesight, as well as our freedom.  When we think, just for a second,  of
the bulls' kishkas (intestines) spilling onto the floor of the temple, we  can see how the prayer that traditionally we say after leaving the rest room,  might be something that we can gratefully recite. "Blessed are you, the Lord our  God, King of the Universe, who fashioned man with wisdom and created within him  many openings and cavities. It is obvious and known before your Throne of Glory  that if but one of them were to be ruptured, or but one of them were to be  blocked, it would be impossible to survive and stand before You. In the merit of  my appreciation for Your wondrous works, may you grant me good health and long  life." It is easy for one to scoff at this
prayer. But ask one who has  survived colon cancer, an intestinal
blockage, or even a kidney stone just  how meaningful this prayer is.
Some years ago there was a public  debate in the newspapers when a beloved  rabbi was misquoted as saying  that the Orthodox are praying  daily for the return of Temple sacrifices.  It is the traditional belief that when the  Messiah comes and the world  will be perfect, there will no longer be a need
for offerings of atonement  because people will no longer sin. However the thanksgiving  offerings will  always be needed (Talmud Pesachim 50a). These thanksgiving offerings will be 40  loaves of bread of the four types outlined in this  week's portion in  Leviticus 7:1-15. 
In next week's special Haftarah  from the  Book of Ezekiel 36:16-38,  the prophet speaks of the ingathering of the  exiles and our purification.
Ezekiel says something interesting: "I shall  give you a new heart and a new spirit....I  shall remove the heart of stone  from your flesh and give you a heart of flesh" (36:26). This, the sages teach,  is all in preparation of Messianic times. 
Why, do I, as a modern Jew,   have a Moshiac theme in this d'var along with numerous mentions of body parts  and organs?
This week a dear friend asked me about the traditional  position on organ  donation. I wrote to her that her important question  touched on traditional halachic Jewish law principles as well as many Midrashic  and  folkloric interpretations. The idea of organ donation is not really a  new question for the Talmudic sages. 
Remember that traditionally it is  believed that the Talmud and the laws derived from and codified from it, were  orally given
by God to Moses on Mt. Sinai. Liberal Jews think of the Talmud  and the laws that derive from it as scholarly works of learned men who were  doing their best to keep us together during the enormous national disaster of  the Babylonian and Roman
forced  diasporas and the  nationalization of Christianity as the state religion by Emperor  Constantine.
We as Liberal Jews are not bound by these ritual laws. We  may, however, chose to do certain rituals after careful study of it's  historical   significance. 
Talmudically we have an obligation  to preserve human life. This is derived from many verses in the Torah. This is  called Pikuah Nefesh. The most pious are commanded to break Shabbat to save a  life and must break keeping kosher to do the same.
There is another  pertinent Talmudic principle. This is the law against the desecration of a dead  body (Nivul Hamet). Every part of the body must be buried, even if parts are  lost from the body before a person's death. In theory, if a traditional Jew gets  his hand cut off (God forbid),  it must be buried with him. If there is a  motor vehicle accident involving a Jew, his blood and skin must be scraped from  the street and buried.
The traditional rabbis have posited that if there  is an immediate
specific known need of an organ, one can permit a donation of  organs from a deceased  loved one. It is not "kosher" to put organs in a  frozen bank waiting for someone to need them. It is also forbidden to donate a  traditional Jew's body to science
for medical students to dissect and  learn.
A doctor cannot harvest an organ if one is still alive. Of course,  you say, but it is not that simple. Traditionally, there is no such thing as  brain dead. If the heart is pumping, you are alive. Let us hypothesize that one  is brain dead and in a vegetative state. The doctor persuades a family member to  "pull the plug" and donate the fresh organs. Halachically, this would not be  allowed and would even be considered murder.
On a different note, one  could donate a kidney if one's doctor guaranteed one was not putting their life  at risk. One can only give up one's life for three  reasons: If an  aggressor demands that you commit murder, a sexual misdeed, or idolatry. For  other
than these three reasons, you must protect your own life first, as the  Talmud says that  no one's blood is redder (better) than anyone  else's.
And, of course, cremation is not allowed.
What you will  not find in the Halachic laws is the reason that we are  traditionally  concerned about our body and its parts postmortem. Why can one give an organ if  it is going to be used immediately, but not if it will be in a freezer to be  used next week? Saving lives is important and a cornerstone in Judaism, but why  would we prefer that a body rot in dirt than be used
for medical research?  What is the real reason?
Traditionally, derived from Talmud Sanhedrin,  chapter 11, we believe in  corporal resurrection! When the Messiah comes,  we will get our same bodies back and be transported to Jerusalem. If we are  buried in Galut  (exile), we roll through special tunnels underground to  Israel. An amputated limb must be  buried with its original body so that  God can reattach it. Somehow, if we are 
dismembered on a dissection table,  or if our organs go to someone else, God cannot figure out where the pieces are  to give them back to us.
For a  more detailed look at organ transplant and other issues of death, dying and  illness for a Jewish Spiritual and Ethical point of view, please read : Jewish Ethical, Spiritual+ Personal Considerations with  Illness, Dying+ Passing  
By reading chapter 11 of Talmud Sanhedrin you will see  that the whole Messianic concept is not a clear TaNaK (Holy Scriptures) idea.  Our  rabbis are grappling with the conception of a human king-savior to  come and save us from the Romans (who they postulated are descended from Esau!).  
They are also dealing with  the Christian theologians in 500 CE using our Bible as  their own source  book for Jesus. Few rabbis agree with one another as they debate the issue. 
Rabbi Hillel certainly does  not believe in these theories. But as usual, a vote was taken. The traditional  point of view may be thought of as the word of God from Mt.  Sinai, but to  the rabbis 1,500 years ago, it was a theological guess. This guess is  keeping
many deserving sick people from getting organs, corneas, and skin  grafts. A chance for  continued life on this earth is not being granted to  some people, while others are  superstitiously holding on to folkloric  thoughts of Olam ha Ba (the world to come).
The Conservative Jew,  depending on who you ask, will tell you organ donation is fine, to save a life  or help a life, whether you do it immediately or later with a frozen part.  Talmudically, a partially blinded person is freed from many mitzvoth especially  the regelem (pilgrimage) holidays, as being half blind was considered a danger  to life. The Conservative rabbis posited
then that corneal donations, even if  frozen in a bank, should be allowed. And if these were allowed, then of course,  liver, heart, kidney, and other similar organ donations should be allowed as  well.
As informed modern Jews we have to do what our conscience  permits. Certainly, if you believe in Olam ha Ba, with its entrance requirements  of mitzvoth, what better good deed is there than to save a life? The Talmud says  that he who saves one life has saved the world. And the converse is true as  well. By not donating an organ, and causing a life to be lost, one is  Talmudically "killing the world."
If we believe in a kind compassionate  God, full of chesed, then it is not consistent for God to punish us by keeping  us from Olam ha Ba because we gave a cornea to Pedro, a kidney to Achmed, a  liver to Kenesha, a heart to Kanwal, our spleen to Moshe-Pupik. After all, if  Ezekiel says God will give us a
new heart anyway, and God is all powerful,  who is to say God cannot give us whatever parts we may be missing? But as Zero  might say while studying Torah: "Parah Adamah. Have a chalice of mare's sweat  and a Gut Shabbos!"
Shabbat Shalom,
RABBI ARTHUR SEGAL 
Via Shamash Org on-line class service
Jewish Renewal www.jewishrenewal.info
Jewish Spiritual Renewal
Jewish Spirituality
Eco Judaism
Hilton Head Island, SC, Bluffton, SC, Savannah, GA
Join Shamash's Groups on Facebook and LinkedIn.
For other options go to: http://listserv.SHAMASH.ORG/



