RABBI ARTHUR SEGAL:TALMUD YERUSHALMI:GAMALIEL II:TAVI:TAVITA:GOODNESS
 Shalom:
 In Talmud Bavli Tractate Beracoth 16b, we read in the Mishna portion of how  Rabban Gamaliel  II [2nd Century CE], seemed to have contravened a halachic  ruling and his students query him on this.
 ''When Rabban Gamaliel's slave Tavi  (aka Tabi, Aramaic for 'good')  died, Rabban Gamaliel accepted condolences for him. (As was the custom, Gamaliel  stood and his friends walked by him giving him words of condolences). His  students said to him:"You, our teacher, have taught us that one may not accept  condolences for the loss of a Canaanite slave. Why have you done so?'' Rabban  Gamaliel answered:'' My slave Tavi is not like all of the other Canaanite slaves  for he is a worthy individual.''
 The reason that the earlier sages asked a Jew not to mourn for a  non-Jew is because one may think that the deceased is a Jew, and that his  children are Jews. Patrilineal descent existed in Talmudic times. However, in  Talmud Yerushalmi one may mourn for his servants and well as his students, and  Halakah treats them as sons, in Judaism, and hence the laws of condolences  treats them as relatives.
 What made Tavi worthy?  In Talmud Bavli Tractate Sukkah 20b as well as  in Tractate Yoma 87a, Tavi, a non-Jew was a Torah scholar.  And that Rabban  Gamaliel taught Tavi Torah (Talmud Bavli Tractate Megillah 75a)
 There is a humorous story on Daf 16b of Beracoth of how when Rabbi  Eliezer's maid died, his students chased him all over his house, up the stairs,  down the stairs, to try to give him condolences which he would not accept  because of the original halakah. He said to his students,'' Just as we do not  express condolences  when one's donkey or ox dies, we do not express  condolences when one's maid dies.''
 This leads into a prayer, which is found in our prayer books, which I do 3  times a day. It helps humble me, and reminds me what Jews were like in 200 CE  and what Jews are like now. Our nature has not changed. Rabbi Judah ha Nasi  recites a pray asking God to keep evil away from him, whether brought on by  non-Jews or Jews. Now the interesting part, is that Emperor Marcus Aurelious,  called Antonious in the Talmud, had Rabbi Judah ha Nasi, awarded with real armed  Roman (actually Goth and German)  soldier body guards. (Talmud Tractate  Avodah Zarah 10a,10b). And even with these guards, Judah still needed God's help  in keeping him safe from non-spiritual jealous Jews. I am but a bug compared to  Rabbi Judah ha Nasi. We Rabbis today are reminded that if Jews then tried to do  Rabbi Judah harm, (and he was the redactor of the Mishna), we should never be  shocked when Jews today try to disparage and even harm us rabbis. 
 Now back to Tavi. He obeyed the mitzvah of dwelling in a Sukkah during the  holiday of Sukkoth, but does so in a non-halachic way. Tavi sleeps under the  bed. Hence the bed, and not skhahk, is over him. Talmud Yerushalmi asks why Tavi  just didn't sleep outside the Sukkah if his dwelling in the Sukkah did not  meet halachic requirements. But they didn't deny him, as a non-Jew, the right to  dwell in a Sukkah. (Talmud Bavli Tractate Sukkah 1a),
 But here is the kicker, in the next Mishna in Tractate Sukkah, 2.1, Rabban  Gamaliel refers to Tavi as a  ''talmid chacham." He is labeled a Torah  Scholar and now the lines of distinction between a servant and a talmid, a  servant and a Jew, and servant and a son, are dissolved via Rabban Gamaliel.  This again is an example of Judaism taking from cultures around it and putting a  Judaic spin on it. The Aristocratic Greeks had house slaves whom they taught and  respected. The name for these slaves are ''threptos'' and the meaning is 'slave  bred in the household of his master.' Note the word 'bred.'
 We also know the Tavi wore tephillin. While slaves were required to say the  Amidah, and even the  Beracoth ha Mazon, Tavi went beyond the sages  rulings, and without their denial, wore tephillin. 
 But the lines between slave/master and student/teacher blur even more.  Rabban Gamaliel said to Tavi his servant: ' Go and get me good food from the  market.' He went and bought him tongue. He said to him: 'Go and get me bad food  from the market.' He went and bought him tongue. Said he to him: 'What is this?  When I told you to get good food you bought me tongue, and when I told you to  get bad food you also bought me tongue! ' Tavi replied: ' Good comes from  it and bad comes from it. When the tongue is good there is nothing better, and  when it is bad there is nothing worse.' Rabban Gamaliel made a feast for  his disciples and placed before them tender tongues and hard tongues. They began  selecting the tender ones, leaving the hard ones alone. Said he to them:'' Note  what you are doing! As you select the tender and leave the hard, so let your  tongues be tender to one another .'' Tavi teaches Gamaliel about Lashon ha ra,  literally bad tongue, and Gamaliel passes the oral teaching to his students.  (Midrash Leviticus Rabbah  33:1 )
 Now let us parse some Talmud Yerushalmi. The story is told in the Talmud of  Eretz-Israel [Talmud  Yerushalmi Tractate Ketuboth 23a]. Rabban Gamaliel  accidentally knocked out a tooth of his favorite servant, Tavi. He conferred  with Rabbi Yehoshu'a, saying, "I think I have found a reason to free my servant,  Tavi , because I knocked out one of his teeth and the Torah [Exodus 21:27]  requires a master to free a servant who suffered mayhem at his hands). Rabbi  Yehoshu'a reminded him that he was only required to do so by law if two  competent witnesses testified against him in court. But, of course, Rabban  Gamaliel could free Tavi from servitude whenever he wished. However, Tavi  did not want to be released. Rabbi Yehoshu'a did not say that Rabban Gamaliel  could not free Tavi, only that he did not have to. We know see the lines of  servant/master becoming friend/friend.
 Now we will see the lines of Gentile/Jew being blurred further. Rabban  Gamaliel, as reported in Tractate Pesachim 7:2  , asked Tavi  ''to roast a lamb for Passover on the grill.'' Now remember, the  Temple is destroyed, and the Rabbis decreed we cannot eat roast lamb on Pesach  any more, and we have its shank bone on our ceremonial Passover plate  to remind us of this offering at the Temple. Gamaliel skirts this  ruling by saying that his lamb is being cooked by the heat of the grill which is  hot from the fire, and not by actual roasting. In any event, a non-Jew, does not  prepare the Passover lamb. Also remember that before the Ezra Temple was  destroyed in 70 CE, the 4th question for Jewish children at a Passover seder was  ''Why on all other nights do we eat meat that is   roasted, stewed or  cooked, but on this night we only eat meat that is roasted.'' Tractate Pesachim  10:4. After the Temple's destruction, this question was dropped and the one  about reclining was added.
 Now Talmud Yerushalmi Tractate Niddah 2:1 tells us of Gamaliel's maid  servant, Tavita (Tabita, also Aramaic for ''good'').
 Supposedly she was special as was Tavi. ''It happened that Tavita, Rabban  Gamliel's serving girl, was carrying wine
for drinks. She inspected herself to see if her period had begun before lifting up each jug of wine. When her period started, she said to Rabban Gamliel: My lord, I have seen a blood stain on my garment. Rabban Gamliel was upset at the possibility that the wine had been rendered ritually unclean. She said to him: Do not be concerned. I was inspecting myself before lifting each jug. ''
In Leviticus Rabbah referred to above, 19:4, Rabban Gamaliel becomes so joyful he yells:'' May your life be given to you, even as you have restored mine to me!'' Remember that Rabban Gamaliel II was Nasi of the Talmudic academy in Yavnah, and could not be known for serving tainted wine. Tavita, a non-Jew, does not have to watch for laws of family purity for herself. She does so out of respect for her master. But in Tavita's case the lines between a giver of sustenance and life by her master, and her granting him life, become blurred as well.
 for drinks. She inspected herself to see if her period had begun before lifting up each jug of wine. When her period started, she said to Rabban Gamliel: My lord, I have seen a blood stain on my garment. Rabban Gamliel was upset at the possibility that the wine had been rendered ritually unclean. She said to him: Do not be concerned. I was inspecting myself before lifting each jug. ''
In Leviticus Rabbah referred to above, 19:4, Rabban Gamaliel becomes so joyful he yells:'' May your life be given to you, even as you have restored mine to me!'' Remember that Rabban Gamaliel II was Nasi of the Talmudic academy in Yavnah, and could not be known for serving tainted wine. Tavita, a non-Jew, does not have to watch for laws of family purity for herself. She does so out of respect for her master. But in Tavita's case the lines between a giver of sustenance and life by her master, and her granting him life, become blurred as well.
The lessons here, spread through out both Talmuds, and Midrashim, is that  Goodness is not just a trait one develop  by being a pious Jew. Goodness  comes when we treat one another, regardless of our backgrounds, or status, with  goodness. No one can be denied the opportunity to do mitzvoth. If a Canaanite  slave can do mitzvoth, certainly Jewish women, and well as Jewish homosexuals,  physically or mentally challenged, spouses of Jews, Anusim, etc.,  can be active,equal, members of a true Talmudic rabbinic congregation and  society. 
  Shalom:
 Rabbi Arthur Segal
 Jewish Spiritual Renewal
 Jewish Renewal
 Eco-Judaism
 Jewish Spirituality
 Hilton Head Island, SC
 Bluffton, SC
 Savannah, GA